Skip to content

description: On-premises and colocation reference architectures for announcing your isp6 IPv6 PA allocation directly from your own data centres: a single-DC pattern with a CE router pair and eBGP, a multi-D

Reference Architectures: On-Premises and Colocation

Audience: isp6 members, network engineers, and platform architects who are announcing IPv6 PA space directly from their own data centre or colocation facility (rather than from a cloud provider's edge). This article assumes you control your own BGP-speaking edge equipment, have an ASN, and have completed isp6's standard activation flow (which produces the inet6num, route6, and ROA records you need).

Last updated: May 2026


1. What's in this article

Two on-premises / colocation reference architectures, plus a closing hybrid pattern:

  • Architecture A: a single data centre running its own BGP edge. A pair of CE routers run eBGP with two upstream transit providers and an internet exchange route server. RPKI ROV is enforced locally. Inside the DC, a pair of L3 core switches feed a stateful firewall cluster fronting DMZ, application, and database VLANs, each with its own IPv6 /64.
  • Architecture B: two data centres, each with its own /48 from a single /44. Independent eBGP sessions from each DC. iBGP via a route-reflector pair runs over a DCI (dark fibre, wavelength, or MPLS L3VPN). Each DC's /48 is advertised independently.
  • Closing hybrid pattern: a sketch (no separate diagram) of how a /48 in your DC coexists with /48s in AWS, Azure, or GCP, all from the same isp6 /44.

Unlike the cloud articles, you own the BGP origin in these patterns: your own ASN appears in the global routing table, and the choices about route filtering, prefix lists, BFD, RPKI cache deployment, and DCI media are all yours. For the cloud-side BYOIP guides see AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.


2. Architecture A: single-DC with a CE router pair

When to choose this: one production site, your own facility or a colocation cage, your own ASN, an HA pair of CE routers, and two or three upstream relationships (typically two transit providers plus an internet exchange).

On-premises single-site reference architecture: one isp6 /48 announced from a customer data centre. A pair of CE routers run eBGP with two upstream transit providers (and a route server at an internet exchange), with RPKI Route Origin Validation against an on-site cache. Inside the DC, a pair of L3 core switches feed a firewall pair fronting DMZ, application, and database server VLANs, each with an IPv6 /64. Servers obtain addresses via SLAAC or DHCPv6.
Architecture A: a /48 announced from one DC, with the CE router pair as the BGP origin and three subnet tiers (DMZ / app / DB) sitting behind a stateful firewall HA cluster.

2.1 The BGP plane

Layer Role Notes
Upstream transit (A, B) Two independent transit providers, each receiving the full IPv6 table and your /48 Pick providers in different ASes; ideally different physical paths to the DC
Internet exchange Optional but recommended: a route server at LINX, AMS-IX, DE-CIX, etc. Drops latency and cost for nearby networks; lets you reach content directly
CE router pair Your edge, running BGP-4 with IPv6 address-family enabled iBGP-mesh between them; ECMP across upstreams; BFD on all sessions
RPKI cache An on-site Routinator or rpki-client deployment, feeding both CEs over RTR Lets you ROV-drop invalid prefixes received from upstreams; pin the local cache as valid for your own prefix so you don't depend on global RPKI convergence to reach yourself
ROA for your /48 + your ASN Created and managed via your isp6 subnet dashboard This is what makes your /48 ← AS 64500 announcement RPKI-valid for everyone else

The CE pair is the only thing the global routing table sees from your site: the upstreams accept your /48 from you, RPKI ROV passes, and the /48 propagates worldwide.

2.2 The DC plane

Layer IPv6 carve Notes
Transit / link nets …:0::/64 (or shorter, /127 per link per RFC 6164) Between CEs, between CE and core, between core and firewall
DMZ …:10::/64 Reverse proxies, WAFs, public-facing load balancers
App …:20::/64 Stateless workers, container hosts, batch jobs
DB …:30::/64 Stateful primaries and replicas; no default route off-site
Management …:fe::/64 (typical) Bastions, jump hosts, RPKI cache, monitoring

The same /48 → /56 → /64 convention from the cloud articles works at home too; the deeper carving discussion is in Planning Your isp6 Allocation.

2.3 Addressing the hosts

Three address-assignment modes coexist on most DC VLANs:

  • SLAAC for general-purpose VMs and container hosts that don't care about their address;
  • DHCPv6 (stateless) when you want the same hosts to receive DNS and other options from a managed server without giving up SLAAC for the address itself;
  • Static for load-balancer VIPs, database primaries, and anything else that must keep the same address across reboots and rebuilds.

DHCPv6-PD (prefix delegation) is rare inside a single DC. It shows up if you delegate /60s out to subordinate L3 boundaries (hypervisor stacks, tenant networks), but most DC topologies prefer to centralise that in the IPAM tool.


3. Architecture B: multi-DC with iBGP and a DCI

When to choose this: two (or more) production sites, each capable of running the workload, with east-west replication between them. You want either active/active or active/standby across sites, and you want each site's /48 to be its own globally-routable advertisement so a site failure cleanly withdraws.

On-premises multi-site reference architecture: an isp6 /44 split into two /48s, one announced from each of two data centres (LON-DC1 and FRA-DC1). Each DC has its own CE router pair and upstream eBGP sessions. The two DCs are connected by a data centre interconnect (dark fibre or wavelength) carrying iBGP via a route reflector pair, which lets each DC reach the other's service VLANs as backup or for east-west replication. Both DCs advertise their respective /48s to the public internet.
Architecture B: a /44 split into two /48s, one per DC; iBGP via route reflectors over the DCI carries inter-DC reachability; eBGP at each DC carries the /48 to the public internet.

3.1 What the two /48s do

/48 Lives in Announced from Notes
2001:db8:1000::/48 LON-DC1 LON-DC1's CE pair, AS 64500 Primary site for the workload
2001:db8:1001::/48 FRA-DC1 FRA-DC1's CE pair, AS 64500 Secondary site; can be promoted on LON failure

Both /48s come from the same /44 in the RIPE Database, and both ROAs are managed through your isp6 dashboard. The public internet sees two separate /48 advertisements with the same origin ASN, which is a perfectly normal anycast or multi-site pattern.

If you want a single anycast IPv6 service address across both sites, deploy that inside the /48 of each site (e.g. 2001:db8:1000::1 in LON and 2001:db8:1001::1 in FRA) and add an anycast service prefix more specific than /48 only if you are prepared to deal with global-routing-table filtering for anything longer than /48, which usually means you should keep anycast within a single /48 per site and use DNS-based routing to pick the site, not BGP.

3.2 The DCI plane

Layer Carries Notes
Physical Dark fibre, wavelength, or an MPLS L3VPN from a carrier Bandwidth is your call; latency is what physics gives you
L3 over the DCI A routed link or an OSPFv3 / IS-IS-v6 adjacency between the DC cores Keeps the failure domain compact; don't bridge L2 across DCs unless you really mean it
iBGP via Route Reflector pair Inter-DC reachability for both /48s and the inside-the-DC /56s Two RRs (one in each DC, same cluster-id) eliminates an N×N iBGP mesh and survives one RR failing
East-west traffic DB replication, batch jobs, service-to-service for affinity reasons Encrypt at the DCI if it isn't already a private circuit you own end-to-end

3.3 Why each DC is its own /48 and not a single /48 shared

This is the same point as in Sizing §5.1: splitting a /48 across two announcing origins is what the global routing table can see, but it is fragile: an announcement from FRA's /48-out-of-/48 plus an announcement from LON's /48-out-of-/48 would require longer-than-/48 prefixes that most networks will simply filter. The clean answer is one /48 per site, which makes /44 the natural size for multi-DC.


4. Closing pattern: hybrid: a /48 in a DC and /48s in public clouds

The most common real estate is neither pure cloud nor pure DC. It is a /48 in a DC for the data tier or for compliance reasons, plus one or more /48s in public clouds for elasticity, latency, or product reasons, all from the same isp6 /44.

The pattern is just the constellation diagram with the address columns populated:

/48 from your /44 Where it lives BGP origin Read
2001:db8:1000::/48 Your DC Your ASN This article
2001:db8:1001::/48 AWS eu-west-2 AS 16509 / 14618 Reference Architectures: AWS
2001:db8:1002::/48 Azure uksouth AS 8075 Reference Architectures: Azure
2001:db8:1003::/48 GCP global AS 396982 Reference Architectures: Google Cloud

Four /48s in the routing table, four different BGP origins, one isp6 /44. Three operational properties of this pattern are worth pulling out. They are the things that make hybrid work:

  • One source of truth. Every one of those /48s authorises its origin through a ROA, and every ROA lives under the isp6 RPKI certification authority. Adding AWS to an estate that previously announced from your DC is one ROA change in the isp6 dashboard, not a new RIR engagement.
  • Independent failure domains. The DC /48 can be withdrawn (carrier failure, facility issue, planned maintenance) without touching the cloud /48s. The cloud /48s can be deprovisioned (cloud-account closure, region exit) without touching the DC /48.
  • Private east-west, public north-south. Inter-/48 traffic should travel over private interconnects: DX / ExpressRoute / Cloud Interconnect from the DC to each cloud, and the same DCI from Architecture B between DCs. The public internet is for client traffic, not service-to-service.

The hybrid case is also the practical answer to "what if I'm not sure I want the cloud forever?", your /48 in the DC is the long-term ownership story, and the cloud /48s come and go (or move between clouds) over the life of the allocation without ever needing a renumber on the consumer side.


5. On-prem-specific design rules

Specifics that shape these architectures and that don't apply on AWS, Azure, or GCP:

  • You own the ASN and the ROA. isp6 publishes a ROA covering your /48 (or /44) for your ASN, but the BGP configuration on your CE pair is yours. Get the prefix-list and AS-path filter direction right: announce only your /48(s), and accept only what you should from each upstream.
  • max-length in the ROA matters. Set it to /48; allowing longer (e.g. /128) opens the door to a leak that becomes RPKI-valid for an attacker. See RFC 7454 §6.
  • BCP 38 / RFC 2827 on the IPv6 path. Drop packets sourced from inside your /48 at the upstream ingress; drop packets sourced from outside your /48 at your egress. Trivial to forget when turning on a new transit.
  • BFD on every BGP session. Sub-second failover between CE-A and CE-B and to each upstream is what makes the HA pair actually highly available.
  • OSPFv3 or IS-IS-v6 for the IGP. Either is fine; pick one and use it for both v4 and v6. Don't run separate routing instances per family if you can help it.
  • DHCPv6-PD is rare in the DC, common at the customer edge. Most DC server fleets use SLAAC with static reservations for VIPs.
  • Document the /56-per-zone carving in IPAM. A DC that lives long enough will sprout more VLANs than you planned. Reserve generously and apply the bisection method when handing out /56s to new zones.

6. What's intentionally out of scope

Topic Where to look
isp6 onboarding, inet6num, route6, ROA management Planning Your isp6 Allocation and your isp6 subnet dashboard
Sizing decision (/48 vs /44) Sizing: /44 vs /48
Cloud-side BYOIP mechanics AWS, Azure, Google Cloud
Physical, power, cooling Your facility/colo operator's runbook
Detailed BGP-tuning, route policy, MED / local-pref RFC 7454 + your vendor's BGP guide
Server-side DNS, IPAM (DDI) selection A separate operations decision

7. Further reading

Other reference architectures in this series

isp6 knowledge base

RIPE NCC and IETF

Tooling and operational references


This document is provided for informational purposes. Protocol specifications and cloud provider behaviour are subject to change. Consult the linked RFCs and vendor documentation for authoritative, up-to-date information before making architectural decisions.